Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelten, O. S.
dc.contributor.authorKam Hepdeniz, Özge
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, Yasin
dc.contributor.authorKankaya, D. A.
dc.contributor.authorGürdal, Osman
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T06:50:37Z
dc.date.available2020-11-27T06:50:37Z
dc.date.issued03.07.2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.issn2229-7731
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_538_19
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12445/1467
dc.description.abstractAim: The aims of this study were to evaluate the surface morphology and surface roughness of restorative materials containing glass ionomer, analyze Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation on the surface of materials, and determine the correlation between surface roughness and biofilm. Materials and Methods: Four restorative materials: resin modified glass ionomer; giomer; amalgomer; and glass carbomer were used and for each material, 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness disc shaped specimens were prepared to evaluate the surface morphology (n = 3), surface roughness (n = 16), and biofilm (n = 20). Surface morphology was analyzed with a scanning electron microscope. Surface roughness was evaluated via an atomic force microscope. The biofilm was evaluated by counting the colony forming units. Surface roughness measurements were evaluated using a one way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD test. Biofilm parameters were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis H and Mann Whitney U test. Pearson’s correlation test was used to determine the correlation between surface roughness and biofilm. Results: While the highest roughness values were obtained for amalgomer and glass carbomer, the lowest roughness values belonged to giomer and resin modified glass ionomer. Statistically significant differences in the number of adherent bacteria were observed between the materials only on day 1. No statistically significant correlation was determined between surface roughness and biofilm. Conclusions: The resin content and small filler particle size of material positively affect surface roughness. However, there is no direct relationship between surface roughness and biofilm.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMedknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_538_19en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectAtomic Force Microscopyen_US
dc.subjectBiofilmen_US
dc.subjectGlass ionomeren_US
dc.subjectScanning Electron Microscopyen_US
dc.subjectSurface Propertiesen_US
dc.titleEffect of surface characteristic of different restorative materials containing glass ionomer on streptococcus mutans biofilmen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage957en_US
dc.identifier.endpage964en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess