Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAcar, Banu
dc.contributor.authorNurözler Tabakcı, Burcu
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T08:02:38Z
dc.date.available2021-10-26T08:02:38Z
dc.date.issued27.07.2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.issn1573-2630
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01925-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12445/1544
dc.description.abstractPurpose To analyze the visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity (CS), and patient satisfaction differences between the bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and the mix–match implantation of an extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL and a diffractive trifocal IOL. Methods A total of 20 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP (Group 1) and 20 patients who had a mix–match implantation of AT LARA 829MP in the dominant eye and AT LISA tri 839MP in the nondominant eye (Group 2) were evaluated. Uncorrected distance (4 m), intermediate (60 cm and 80 cm), and near (40 cm) visual acuity, as well as CS, defocus curve, and responses to the patient questionnaires, were evaluated. Results Eighty eyes of 40 patients were included. Uncorrected distance and near visual outcomes were similar between the groups (p [0.05). Group 2 showed significantly better intermediate visual outcomes at 60 cm and 80 cm than Group 1 (p \0.05). Group 2 showed significantly better CS outcomes (photopic and mesopic) than Group 1 (p \0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding defocus curves from ? 0.00 D to - 2.00 D, but a significant difference was shown from - 2.00 D to - 4.00 D. Patients’ satisfaction was significantly higher in Group 2 for driving at night (p\0.05). Conclusions Both groups showed an effective visual performance. Group 2 exhibited better photopic and mesopic CS. The combination of EDOF and trifocal IOL seems to be a good option with a comfortable vision at all distances and less adverse visual phenomena.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01925-8en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectEnhanced Depth of Focusen_US
dc.subjectIntraocular Lensen_US
dc.subjectTrifocalen_US
dc.subjectCataract Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPhotic Phenomenaen_US
dc.titleClinical outcome comparison: bilateral trifocal vs. mix– match extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lensesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-8893-1739en_US
dc.identifier.startpage3675en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3686en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess