Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKonca, Fatma Aslı
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Merve Nur
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T07:23:26Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T07:23:26Z
dc.date.issued12.2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.21025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12445/2007
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare digital and conventional impressions in terms of impression time, and comfort, anxiety, and preference of the patients. Methods: Digital scans (Trios 3 Cart) and conventional impressions (irreversible hydrocolloid material, hand-mixed) were randomly performed on 39 patients by a single experienced operator at 14-21-day intervals (crossover design). The impression time, comfort score with the visual analog scale, anxiety level with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and preference with a questionnaire, were recorded. The 2 techniques were compared with the independent t-test in terms of time, comfort, and anxiety. Patient–operator assessment and time–comfort relationship were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation test. Results: No statistical difference was found between the 2 impression techniques in terms of time (P = .231). Both the operators’ and patients’ comfort scores showed that the digital technique was found to be more comfortable (P < .001). There was no statistical difference between the 2 techniques with regard to anxiety (P = .668). The patients’ and operators’ comfort scores showed a strong correlation (P < .001), but no correlation was found between comfort and time (P > .05). Conclusion: Digital scanning and conventional dental impression were similar in terms of impression time and anxiety of patients. However, patients were more satisfied with the digital technique, and preferred it.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Orthodontic Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.21025en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectIntraoral Scanneren_US
dc.subjectDental Impressionen_US
dc.subjectPatient Comforten_US
dc.subjectDental Anxietyen_US
dc.subjectClinical Efficiencyen_US
dc.titleAn updated comparison of current impression techniques regarding time, comfort, anxiety, and preference: A randomized crossover trialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDiş Hekimliği Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-9564-6212en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-4551-9784en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage227en_US
dc.identifier.endpage233en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess